"The loss I have suffered is of monetary and emotional significance.."
The Muslim 20-year-old law student, Saima Ahmad, sent a letter to Nestle company demanding the following:
The truth of the matter is; manufacturers owe a duty of care to consumers.Saima is using an old 1930s law to back up her demands.
‘The specific duty you owe in consistency in your manufacturing process. The failure to take due care in the manufacturing process resulted in a product being defective.
‘As a result I feel as though I have been misled to part with my money and purchase a product that is clearly different from what has been marketed by Nestle.
‘The loss I have suffered is of monetary and emotional significance.
‘I would like a full refund of the defective pack of KitKat I purchased. I have also lost my faith in Nestle.
‘Clearly, if I wanted to purchase a confectionery item that is purely chocolate, I would have purchased a bar of Galaxy.
‘I would therefore like to request a life-long supply of KitKat so that I can act as a means of quality control – it appears you need me more than I need you
This has got to be a joke, but one never knows. There are a plethora of frivolous law suits that wind up in courts.