Luke Rudkowski's Latest 9/11 Conspiracy Theory B.S.

So Luke Rudkowski of We Are Change posted  a video on 9/11/14 of an interview with a man named Ricki, an alleged survivor of 9/11 who claims he had some "explosive" new photos that he'd lived with for 13 years.  Saturday was the day those photos would be released. One can only assume that since Rudkowski is a conspiracy theorist, 9/11 Truther those photos would be, well, EXPLOSIVE. Well, they're not.

You might be wondering what exactly these nut jobs think is so important about a bunch of photos that show nothing out of the ordinary. Well, this is where it gets interesting. There isn't even a common consensus on what they actually believe happened.

The various loony theories range from the relatively simple, blame it on the U.S. government:

BodaBoom BigAl2 days ago
The terrorists were "allowed" to do this. It was a set-up to implement the misnamed Patriot Acts, er Traitorous Acts!

Then there's those who blame it on Israel/Mossad/The Zionists:

upsideadown2 days ago
You mean Israeli terrorists.

SlackerSlayer2 days ago
 It would be far more accurate to say 'zionnazis dressed up as Arabs" doing terror.

Steve McCoy2 days ago
get cancer and DIE jewSCUMTROLLLLLL. We KNOW israHELLL did 911 and WILL pay.....sooooooooon.

There are those who don't believe the Osama Bin Laden narrative:

6. People whose beliefs are often strongly influenced by the beliefs of the vast majority, and who are under the impression that the vast majority of the civilized world accepts the bin Laden story as fact.

Then there's the uber-wackos who actually believe there were no planes, or that they were holographs, and that the whole tragedy was a Hollywood event:

tonoklein2 days ago
That's right, when you got nothing, call people names. Sure sign of a brilliant argument. But hey keep believing known liars/actors/millionaires on TV who want you dead.

 Steve McCoy1 day ago
Or read the affidavit of aviation expert John Lear - FACTUAL proof NO planes were used on 911. He is the son of Bill Lear, as in Lear jets. The planes were a jewllywood fake movie.

Then there's the 'racism' factor:

MixmanD282 days ago
Yes, isn't it amazing that some jerks prefer to believe "facts", instead of racist notions of what a terrorist is?

 imranp20102 days ago
+Lu Cor racists who want to blame brown people...

Those were all responses to a comment I made on YouTube.

Here's the holograph, no airplane comments from the We Are Change website:

JamesOrrSeptember 14, 2014

He alluded to the fact that these were not planes, but anti-gravity aircraft pulling impossible maneuvers. We know there were holographic projectors on-board these aircraft giving the outward appearance of planes. I was expecting to see the aircraft in these photos.

And there's the less crazy conspiracy theorists turning on the more lunatic ones:

Kv
September 14, 2014

You “no plane” idiots are going to ruin the whole truth movement and you don’t even care.

Michael Clarke
September 14, 2014

YOU are the “idiot”, here, mate. The point is valid. There is NO debris from any crash jetliner(s) here. No fuselage, no portions of wings , tails, engines, NOTHING But the structural damage is VERY similar to the Oklahoma City federal building bombing. There is AMPLE physical evidence here to support the supposition that these buildings collapsed in accordion fashion DUE TO INTERNAL EXPLOSIVE CHARGES DETONATED INSIDE THEM

Kv
September 14, 2014

Even if your theory is plausible (which it’s not, I know people there who saw the f-ing planes) no one will believe it because it’s TOO out there. We are just now getting people to admit something is amiss with building 7. You are stupid little fish being reeled in and guided by disinfo agents here to muddy the waters and make ANY conspiracy theorists look like fucking nut jobs. And quite successfully too I might add.

I was called a paid shill, among other things, for my comment on YouTube, as you can see in some of those comments above.

It truly amazes me how many of them are out there. Walking this earth. Convinced that it's the U.S. government, or Zionist Israel, or Hollywood behind every world event.  Yikes.

YouTube Invites 200 "Super Flaggers" To Police Videos

YouTube has invited a select group of snitches. About 200 of them. Government agencies, organizations and individuals who have the power to flag videos (up to 20 in one go) and, as a result, take down someone's channel.

Apparently the YouTube team that monitors videos 24/7 doesn't have the time to catch all the ones someone in Google-land deems inappropriate, so they they have added these "super flaggers." YouTube will then review those flagged videos, 90% of which get dumped or given restricted access.

Some of the government agencies include the British police unit who are on the lookout for extremist videos which are not allowed on YouTube, but which are plentiful.

"We have a zero-tolerance policy on YouTube towards content that incites violence," YouTube told the Financial Times. "Our community guidelines prohibit such content and our review teams respond to flagged videos around the clock, routinely removing videos that contain hate speech or incitement to commit violent acts. To increase the efficiency of this process, we have developed an invite-only program that gives users who flag videos regularly tools to flag content at scale."

According to Google, less than 10 of those flaggers are affiliated with a government agency or NGO. Apparently, the rest are just people who have plenty of time on their hands to spend flagging videos.

One of the casualties of these super flaggers was Mark Dice, at least that's what Luke Rudkowski of WeAreChange thinks might have happened.  Dice's YouTube channel was taken down without warning. Mark Dice is a loony conspiracy theorist (as is Rudkowski, though they differ on some issues), but Dice made some interesting man-on-street videos proving just how stupid the average Democratic voter is, here and here.

Rudkowski discusses the situation in his latest video.

On the one hand, freedom of speech is one of our inalienable rights, but do we give lunatics and terrorists a public voice? Do we keep these people in the public eye so they can be monitored, or do we drive them further underground? I'm not sure how I feel about this.

Stupid Obama Voters- They Actually Hate Obama's Policies- Video

In the next week, I am going to be focusing on posting election related material because this is the most important election of my lifetime. I know that I am probably mostly preaching to the choir here, but since I do get google traffic I'm hoping that maybe one undecided might be swayed to make the right decision: voting for Mitt Romney.

That said, here's another video of more incredibly stupid Barack Obama voters. Besides this, this and this we now have this:

Luke Rudkowski, of We Are Change (The Blaze claims he has some "9/11 Truther connections") interviewed a bunch of Obama supporters in NYC. He makes it abundantly clear that neither the video nor his organization is in support of Romney, but I'm glad he produced this anyway. It demonstrates just how clueless Obama voters really are, and how shallow their reasons are for voting for him.

In the interviews, Luke asked people what they thought about various Obama policies including:

1. Extending and expanding the Patriot act
2. The National Defense Authorization Act- (Spying Skyrocketing)
3. The Secret Kill List
4. Expanding the drone bombing six times more than George Bush

But he told them that they were Romney's policies. Luke just wanted an honest opinion, hence the subterfuge.

They called 'Romney': "a psychopath", "crazy guy, that's why I'm voting for Obama", and most were stunned (and I'm sure more than a little embarrassed) when Luke finally confessed that it was actually Obama's policies they were trashing. But, for the most part, it made little to no difference. Some said they didn't believe Luke. Others said  they would vote for Obama anyway for other reasons. Only two said they would have to do some research, and possibly rethink their decision. I doubt they will, but you never know.

So, after vilifying Romney for Obama's  "disturbing and wrong" "unconstitutional and immoral" "warhawk" policies, these ignorant liberals will still vote for Obama.

One female immigrant even talked about how she came from a country that was a dictatorship, and didn't want to go back to that. Hmm.




The Youtube account lists some of the sources.

Here are some of the sources that were mentioned throughout the interviews

1st question, part 1 - Obama, in Europe, signs Patriot Act extension
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/43180202/ns/us_news-security/t/obama-europe-signs...

1st question, part 2 - Warrantless Spying Skyrockets Under Obama
http://reason.com/archives/2012/10/03/warrantless-spying-skyrockets-under-obam

2nd question - President Obama Signed the National Defense Authorization Act - Now What?
http://www.forbes.com/sites/erikkain/2012/01/02/president-obama-signed-the-na...

3rd question - Secret 'Kill List' Proves a Test of Obama's Principles and Will
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/29/world/obamas-leadership-in-war-on-al-qaeda....

4th question - Drone wars and state secrecy -- how Barack Obama became a hardliner
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/jun/02/drone-wars-secrecy-barack-obama

Source: The Blaze