Adam Schiff's Horror Movie Alter Egos

There's something terribly off about Adam Schiff.  Apart from being a despicable little man who has clear signs of being a sociopathic liar:

Creating elaborate lies for their own gain with no care about who gets hurt is a hallmark of sociopathic lying. Sociopaths are compulsive pathological liars.

Sociopaths lie without conscience.

That means that they can look you right in the eye and lie to you and not show the usual markers that would give them away.

It also means that they don’t care about collateral damage.

They get their mind set on a goal and they will make up whatever they need to in their attempts to achieve their goal. It doesn’t matter what the consequences are to others as a result of their lies. It doesn’t matter if other adults get hurt and it doesn’t matter if children get hurt. It doesn't even matter if their own children get hurt.                       

Ann Silvers "How To Spot A Sociopathic Liar" 

He did get 4 Pinocchios from the uber-liberal, Trump-hating Washington Post for lying about his first-hand knowledge regarding the Ukraine Whistle-Blower complaint.  (I'm still convinced the Whistleblower is Schiff himself.)  But that's not why I'm writing this post. It's just that there's also something incredibly creepy about the man. You know, otherworldly creepy. Maybe it's those eyes.

Adam Schiff starring in the "Great Impeachment Sham Show"

Or his monotone vocal quality. And I started thinking about how alienesque he seems and how he'd be perfectly cast in a film along the lines of the horrifically scary Sci-Fi film "Invasion of the Body Snatchers" starring Donald Sutherland where aliens are duplicating humans and then killing them.

1. Invasion of the Body Snatchers

But he'd also make a great serial killer ala Hannibal Lector in "The Silence of the Lambs" played by the incredible Anthony Hopkins.

2.  The Silence of the Lambs

Then there's Carrie in the horror flick by the same name, starring a young Sissy Spacek. Yeah, it's a woman, but those eyes.

3. Carrie

Last but not least, writer-turned-killer Jack Torrance, played by Jack Nicholson in "The Shining."

4. The Shining

So, which part is Schiff a perfect fit for?

Pelosi and the Democratic Party of Hate- Yes you do hate Trump, Nancy!

After announcing that the Democratic majority Congress will begin drafting articles of impeachment against Donald Trump, Nancy Pelosi was asked by reporter James Rosen if she hated the President.  The Sinclair TV network journalist obviously hit a major nerve because the botox queen launched into a hissy fit of denial.

“I don’t hate anybody!" “I was raised in a Catholic house! We don’t hate anybody. Don’t accuse me of hate!”

The meltdown continued with a non sequitur stuttering diatribe where she accused Trump of being a "coward."

“I think this President is a coward when it comes to helping our kids who are afraid of gun violence. I think he is cruel when he doesn’t deal with helping our Dreamers, of which we are very proud. I think he is in denial about the climate crisis.” 

“However, that’s about the election. This is about the Constitution of the United States and the facts that lead to the President’s violation of his oath of office.”

And then ended with:

“And as a Catholic, I resent your using the word hate in a sentence that addresses me. I pray for the President all the time. So don’t mess with me when it comes to words like that.”

Sure, Nancy, we all know what you, Adam Schiff, and the rest of the Democratic Party anti-Trump folk (in tandem with the Republican never-Trumpers) are praying for and have been praying for ever since Trump won the Republican nomination back in July 2016.

We're not stupid, Madam Speaker.  We are very aware of the rabid hatred that you, your fellow party hacks and supporters have been displaying over the past three unbearable years. The loathing is palpable.  YOU and your fellow Democratic members of Congress and Senate have fomented that antipathy through your actions and your vitriol. You have pitted the American people against each other and divided this nation irreparably all because of your hatred of ONE man and your blatant refusal to accept the fact that he won the presidency.

For three years Democrats have attempted to get rid of a duly elected President, not because he's done anything wrong- this country is doing better than it has in many years- but because they flat out hate him and fear he'll get re-elected in 2020. They never gave Trump a chance. Calls for impeachment started soon after his inauguration in early 2017 and have continued through today. Here's a list of 98 things Democrats hoped would lead to impeachment, starting with Joaquin Castro.

 On Feb. 1, 2017, mere days after the Trump’s inauguration, Rep. Joaquin Castro (D-Texas) said the House should consider impeaching the president in the event he doesn’t abide by court orders related to his travel ban.

The haters have done their level best to come up with something that would stick, something that would force him to resign, and have failed at most every attempt including Russian collusion.

It's not just Trump that the Democrats are targeting with their poisonous hate, it's anyone who supports him regardless of race. Their intolerance has become insufferable. They've turned everyone who supports Trump, regardless of their level of support, into pariahs. We've been vilified, attacked physically and verbally, threatened, called names. We've been called a basket of deplorables, racists, Nazis, Putin-lovers. Debra Messing from "Will and Grace" fame called for people to publicly out Trump supporters hearkening back to McCarthy era days.

In November 2018, Breitbart put together a massive list of "Acts of Media Approved Violence Against Trump supporters." There have been plenty more in the year since that was published. There's even a website dedicated to attacks on Trump supporters including a list of the fake hoax hate crimes blamed on Trump supporters, but it's in no way comprehensive.

If you're at all active on Social Media- Facebook and Twitter- you'll experience that hostility first hand. I've seen it. It's incredibly vicious and nasty. And it's only going to get worse.

The Democrats have fully embraced the dark side. All that hate has shut down their ability to think clearly, so seeing the proverbial light will be well nigh impossible.  It's going to be a very rough and bumpy road to election 2020.

In case you want to see Pelosi's meltdown.

Pelosi just called President Trump a coward pic.twitter.com/qwLISzX2to

— Wojciech Pawelczyk 🇵🇱🇺🇸 (@PolishPatriotTM) December 5, 2019

Veterans Day 2019 - Short videos honoring our Vets

With heartfelt thanks to those who serve and have served- who fought and continue to fight for our freedom. We are forever indebted to you brave Souls. You are a blessing not only to this country but to the world.

The 1st video is a tribute to veterans, the 2nd is a very touching short film. You'll need a Kleenex.

You will also be touched by the video in my post from 2012 -  "I fought for you."

We salute you all.

Tulsi Gabbard Is NOT A Friend of Conservatives

"The enemy of my enemy is my friend" comes from an ancient Sanskrit proverb that suggests enemies can come together to fight against a common enemy. We've seen this occur most notably during WW11 when Germany betrayed the Soviet Union's pact with the Nazis to divvy up the land between their borders. The Soviets in tandem with the U.S and Britain were instrumental in defeating the Nazis.

It happens quite often when it comes to foreign policy, but the enemy of my enemy is not always our friend- take Tulsi Gabbard. Kudos to her for giving Kamala Harris a pummeling during the 2nd Democratic Debate when she called Kamala out on her abysmal record during her tenure as California Attorney General.

"She put over 1,500 people in jail for marijuana violations, and then laughed about it when she was asked if she’d ever smoked marijuana. She blocked evidence that would have freed a man from death row until the courts forced her to do so. She kept people in prison beyond their sentences to use them as cheap labor for the state of California. And she fought to keep cash bail system in place that impacts poor people in the worst kind of way."

Boom.

And more kudos for giving Hillary Clinton a monumental smackdown in response to HC insinuating Tulsi is a "Russian asset" during a podcast interview with Campaign HQ's David Plouffe.

Hillary Clinton called Democratic presidential candidate Tulsi Gabbard "the favourite of the Russians" in a recent interview while describing 2016 Green Party presidential candidate Jill Stein as "a Russian asset."

During a podcast appearance this week on Campaign HQ with David Plouffe, the former secretary of state and 2016 Democratic presidential nominee did not mention the Hawaii congresswoman by name, but said she believes the Russians have "got their eye on somebody who's currently in the Democratic primary and are grooming her to be the third-party candidate." 

"She's the favourite of the Russians," Clinton said.

"They have a bunch of sites and bots and other ways of supporting her so far. And that's assuming Jill Stein will give it up, which she might not because she's also a Russian asset."

The Russians know they can't win without a third-party candidate, Clinton added.

Tulsi responded on Twitter with the following:

Great! Thank you @HillaryClinton. You, the queen of warmongers, embodiment of corruption, and personification of the rot that has sickened the Democratic Party for so long, have finally come out from behind the curtain. From the day I announced my candidacy, there has been a ...

— Tulsi Gabbard (@TulsiGabbard) October 18, 2019

The rest of her Tweet:

 concerted campaign to destroy my reputation. We wondered who was behind it and why.
"Now we know — it was always you, through your proxies and powerful allies in the corporate media and war machine, afraid of the threat I pose.

"It's now clear that this primary is between you and me. Don't cowardly hide behind your proxies. Join the race directly."

Boom. Again.

And she's not the only one who believes Hillary has her eyes set on a third presidential run in 2020. There has been speculation from others including ex-aide Mark Penn who said as much back in November 2018. I certainly wouldn't be surprised, considering Clinton's power-hungry lifetime goal has always been to sit in the Oval Office. And it makes total sense calling Tulsi a favorite of the Russians. It's straight out of her playbook. After all, Clinton was the catalyst for the whole Russia/Trump collusion fiasco we've lived with for three unbearable years, and the subsequent rush by Democrats and their leftist supporters to call anyone they disagree with a Russian Bot or any variation thereof. So while I can understand why conservatives would come out in support of Tulsi after the Hillary hit- being called a Russian bot/asset or whatnot is irksome as hell- please remember Tulsi is NOT our friend. In many ways, she's as left as the rest of the Democratic presidential hopefuls.

If you haven't done your research I'll help you out a little. But here's her website for more in-depth information on all the issues, including teaming up with Bernie Sanders to raise the minimum wage, gun control, etc.

MEDICARE FOR ALL:  She's a co-sponsor of H.R.1384 - Medicare for All Act of 2019, which would provide universal health care to all Americans. Plus she's on the Medicare for All Caucus.

CLIMATE CHANGE: " Tulsi is a top leader in fighting for urgent action to address climate change." "I support the carbon neutrality goals of the Green New Deal and the awareness it has brought across the country on the critical issues of energy independence and the climate crisis.."

ABORTION RIGHTS:  She supports the right to choose.

And if that's not enough the website Progressive Army talks about just how progressive Tulsi is.

There might be some issues like her non-interventionist foreign policy stance that many conservatives might embrace, but other than that, she's not even a centrist.

Black Rapper Bryson Gray aka B.Surius Creates Rap #MAGAchallenge on Twitter

You might have noticed the #MagaChallenge floating around your Twitter feed recently. It's a series of random videos by mostly "people of color" rapping about their support for Donald Trump, MAGA, and their contempt for the Democratic party that has shamefully kept them in chains for decades.

It all started with Bryson Gray whose Twitter handle is @SuriusVsVodka. Gray aka B.Surius and KingVodka is a conservative black rapper from North Carolina who decided to throw out a challenge to all MAGA (Make America Great Again) Trump supporters to come up with their own versions of his rap song "MAGA Boy."

MAGA BOY. #MAGACHALLENGE I want y’all to your own rap to it too then tag me! Lets make liberals cry! 😂 pic.twitter.com/vQ9cBr5XJV

— Bryson Gray (@SuriusVsVodka) September 14, 2019

With the onset of the #Blexit and #BlackNotDemocrat movement, we've seen a slew of blacks and Latinos leaving the Democratic Party. Not surprisingly, the Democrats have not taken kindly to the ever-increasing loss of a good chunk of their voter pool, and these new conservatives are now being subjected to the wrath and hatred from the Left that the rest of us have been experiencing since Trump took office. At least those of us who support Trump. Since they can't be called the leftist's favorite word "racist"- though I've actually seen some black conservatives called that- Dems have resorted to hurling racial epithets at them: "Uncle Tom" and far worse. This is touched upon in a powerful song that B.Surius wrote and produced called "Black Not Democrat".

Apparently, Instagram flagged the video claiming it was hate speech. Bryson later mentioned on Twitter that it was reinstated, but I can't seem to find his Instagram account to verify. More conservative censorship.






You can find An0maly, Hotep Withit and G.Notes Justice's versions on Culttture, along with the Instagram notice. And search for #MagaChallenge on Twitter for some of the great raps that people have come up with. It's a thing of beauty.

This whole thing needs to go viral, although that might be a huge challenge in a country where leftists (including the media) shun anyone who doesn't toe the proverbial liberal line, and who loathe Trump so much they have literally spent the past 2 plus years trying to find something- anything- to take him down.

Here's a great one.

#MAGACHALLENGE from @RealMrBehavior

Alright here’s my entry in the #MAGACHALLENGE ⁦@SuriusVsVodka⁩ ⁦@robsmithonline⁩@kr3at

pic.twitter.com/JbDYneefOc

— Alexander Higgins (@kr3at) September 17, 2019

And here's one from some white Brits from "across the pond" just for fun.

9/11 2019- Never Ever Forget

Hard to believe it's been 18 years since we were viciously attacked by Islamist terrorists on September 11, 2001. Almost 3,000 people were mercilessly killed on that day, and that's not counting all those first responders and civilians who have since died- and will die in the future- from 9/11 related injuries and diseases from toxins and dust at Ground Zero. That accounts for another 1,400 or so people to date. That's a hell of a lot of people. Murdered in cold blood.

It's estimated around 200 people fell or jumped to their deaths. I cannot even fathom what they must have been going through at the time when they had to make the decision to either jump or burn to death.  Horrifying.

In 2015 news.com.au published 30 photos from 9/11 as a reminder of why we must never forget September 11.

#NeverForget

Carmen Taylor/AP

Funny Parody Video: Bernie Sanders and Other Dems Discussing How To Get Rid of Trump

For a little levity, here's a talking picture video produced by @TheUnitedSpot featuring Democratic Socialist Senator Bernie Sanders, along with fellow Socialist congresswomen the daft Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and anti-Semite Ilhan Omar, and the evil Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, Rep Maxine Waters and Senate Minority Leader Chuckie Schumer discussing how to take down our duly elected President Donald Trump.

WARNING: Some might find a few words offensive, but it's pretty darn funny.

Enjoy!

D.C. Theatre Cancels Performance of Strzok/Page Anti-Trump Texts Project Over Threats of Violence

Conservative Irish filmmakers Phelim McAleer and Ann McElhinney are known for their documentaries FrackNation, Not Evil Just Wrong, Mine Your Own Business and The Search For Tristan's Mum.  Their New York Times and Amazon Best Seller Gosnell: The Untold Story of America’s Most Prolific Serial Killer was made into a feature film. Since the film deals with the infamous physician abortionist Kermit Gosnell who was jailed for life without the possibility of parole for the first-degree murder of three aborted babies born alive- among other horrors including performing numerous illegal late-term abortions over three decades- they had to fund the movie through crowdsourcing. The film stars conservative actors Dean Cain and Nick Searcy- who also directed. Not surprisingly they had a challenging time getting the film distributed or reviewed. Liberals don't cotton to the anti-abortion issue, as we are witnessing today.

McAleer is again dealing with censorship of sorts. A staged reading of FBI Lovebirds: Undercovers set to be performed on June 13 has been canceled by Washington D.C. Mead Theatre because of "threats of violence".  Apparently, threats were posted on Kristy Swanson's Twitter page. She stars with fellow conservative Dean Cain in the project which is based on the entire anti-Trump texts between senior FBI agent Peter Strzok and FBI attorney Lisa Page.

According to Deadline:

McAleer, in a statement, condemned the cancellation at the Mead Theatre as censorship and pledged “that the show will go on despite the left’s attempts to sabotage it by forcing the venue’s withdrawal so close to the event date.”

“We will get a venue,” said McAleer. “The staged reading will go ahead. It will be filmed and released online and everyone will get to see the truth about how the upper echelons of the FBI tried to subvert democracy. This censorship will not succeed.”

Yahoo Entertainment quotes:

“We are appalled,” they said in another statement. “The Mead Theater withdrew the event, citing ‘threats of violence.’ In actuality, this is an attempt to squash the content of FBI Lovebirds: UnderCovers and what it reveals about the anti-Trump forces in the government. They knew we are filming the play and planning to release it online. That’s why they banned us. They just don’t want the truth out there.”

The statement continued: “In fact, the theatrical establishment is really afraid of the way we are using Verbatim Theater, which utilizes only the actual words and texts from Strzok and Page. ... The intolerant left can’t challenge the actual, verbatim text.”

Whether the theatre legitimately canceled over security concerns or not- it's still censorship!

Support Conservative Artists- Buy MAGA and KAG Accessories and Art Work

Since I have a photography shop on Etsy, I thought I'd share some fellow Etsy shops that are selling items for proud Americans.


Maga Dogs on Etsy sells a cute bandana kerchief for your doggy.  Purchase here.

Right and Ready sells a large assortment of clothing and accessories with the MAGA theme.  Purchase here.

The Donald Store sells hats and t-shirts.  Purchase here.

Get KAG Swag has some skirts, leggings, the usual hats, and other Trump/MAGA-related items. Purchase here.

Here's someone on RedBubble who sells portraits of conservatives including Reagan and Churchill and many others. You can also purchase cellphone cases and a bunch of other products of the at work. Purchase here.

It's not easy to make a living in the arts so go support fellow conservative artists.

The White House Creates Tech Bias Form - Report Censorship of Conservatives

As most people have probably noticed by now, Social Media platforms are targeting big-time conservatives and others who don't toe the liberal line.  They are being suspended in droves, many forever, from Twitter and Facebook, often for no good reason.

If you spend any time on Twitter you will also notice that many of your fellow conservative followers wind up in what has been coined Twitter Jail. Most have no clue what landed them there and Twitter usually doesn't let you know. Those with a large following are usually targeted more than those of us with few followers, but even I wound up being blocked by Twitter from posting during the Kavanaugh hearings last year. One day I discovered I had been locked out for alleged suspicious behavior. After contacting them I received an email claiming my account had exhibited "automated behavior" that violated Twitter rules. I had to jump through a zillion hoops to prove I was not a spammer, and my account was finally unlocked- right after the hearings ended. Interesting timing. I was unable to post for days, even though I had immediately provided everything they had requested. Maybe my case wasn't censorship, but it sure felt like it. Ever see those "Caution: This account is temporarily restricted" notices. Yep, usually conservatives. And even though there are liberal celebrities and others who post vile things on Twitter, rarely if ever are they suspended. It's so obvious who they are censoring.

Many times it's the result of some snowflake liberal who reports someone for something they took offense to.  This kid on Twitter got a gay conservative suspended forever because @GayPatriot responded to someone with the word "tranny". He is so proud of what he did he pinned the post where he confessed to being the one who took @GayPatriot down.

I fear this is going to get worse especially if the Democrats take control of the White House and Senate.  It is imperative we don't lose in 2020.

In the meantime, for what it's worth, the White House has created a tech bias form where you can report any censorship.  Do it now.  It's so important to make sure our voices are not silenced before it's too late.

Report here.

"It's Not A Coup!"- What's Really Going On In Venezuela

Socialist loving liberals keep claiming that what is happening in Venezuela is a coup backed by the American government. The dire situation in that country, both economic and political, also caused by United States interference.

Comedian/writer/actress Joanna Hausmann, a Venezuelan/American living in New York puts that fallacy to rest in the video below where she explains what is really going on over there. And it's not the fault of the big bad imperialist United States of America and its unholy goal of oil dominance.

Hausmann says:

"What is happening in Venezuela is NOT a U.S. backed coup"

"This is not a fight between the Venezuelan Right Wing and the Venezuelan Left Wing. This is a fight of the great majority of Venezuelans to democratically get rid of an illegitimate and punitive dictatorship. A dictatorship of countless human rights issues"

"The people of Venezuela are seeking fair democratic elections using the laws written in our constitution."

"Juan Guaido did not just declare himself president out of nowhere, that is not how it works."

She then explains who Juan Guaido is, and how he was elected as an "interim" president until democratic elections can be held. She then delves into why Nicolas Maduro is "illegitimate" and why the elections were considered "illegitimate" by the international community as a whole, including some European socialist countries.

As for Maduro's alleged popularity in Venezuela?

"80 percent of Venezuelans disapprove of Maduro's government.." 

"He took the minimum wage from $350.00 a month to $7.00 month."

"Inflation hit 1.7 million percent in 2018."

"According to U.N. projections over 5 million people have left the country causing a refugee crisis of Syrian proportions. That's more than 10 percent of the Venezuelan population."

A while back I was talking to a friend who lives in Colombia who told me about the huge influx of refugees pouring into that country from Venezuela. Hausmann's claims are true.

As for all that money from the Venezuelan oil industry, one of the largest reserves in the world?  Stolen by politicians and others with ties to Maduro and Chavez, which is usually what happens with communist/socialist oligarchies. Those ruling at the top have all the money and privileges, while the 'people' get a pittance.

From a Miami Herald article last year:

A web of former Venezuelan officials and businessmen was charged in Miami Wednesday with operating a massive $1.2 billion international money-laundering racket funded with stolen government money that was invested in South Florida real estate and other assets.

The defendants are accused of embezzling funds from Venezuela’s vast oil income and exploiting its foreign-currency exchange system to amass illegal fortunes in the United States and other countries, according to a federal criminal complaint.

The complaint describes a Venezuelan government culture in which officials, politicians and businessmen connected to President Nicolás Maduro and his predecessor, the late Hugo Chávez, have plundered the national oil company, PDVSA, to enrich themselves while impoverishing the South American country.

But the Socialist loving lefties blame the ills in Venezuela not only on the U.S. but Israel and the Saudis as well.

Ronda on Twitter is convinced that we- along with the Israelis and Saudis- are responsible for the demise of the Venezuelan economy.

⏳╰☆ 💕☆𝓡𝓸𝓷𝓭𝓪☆ 💕☆╮ ⏳

‏@39_Ronda
Follow Follow @39_Ronda

More
Replying to @Incognito73 @Rainbojangles
The US, Israel, and Saudi purposely manipulated oil prices, to crash the Venezuelan economy! Saudi flooded the market with oil, even taking a lose for Wall Street and Tel Aviv. It has nothing to do with socialism and everything to do with the greed of a few.

Many lefties happen to be anti-Semitic as well, so not surprising they blame Israel.  Ronda also happens to be an anti-Israel, pro-Pali tool.

Sadly, you can't change their minds.



If Joanna can't convince you, what about this from Foreign Policy-  they endorsed Hillary Clinton in 2016.

James Bloodworth has this to say about how "the left keeps getting Venezuela wrong."

Venezuela is engulfed in a government-inflicted economic crisis twice the size of the Great Depression, which has provoked the largest movement of refugees in the recent history of Latin America. Meanwhile, the regime that has presided over this catastrophe is morphing from a nasty autocracy to a potentially full-blown dictatorship.

[snip]

Yet much of the Western socialist left has persisted in ignoring the trajectory of Venezuela in order to sustain a fantasy of “21st-century socialism.” It’s reminiscent of the Western apologists for the Soviet Union that Arthur Koestler once compared to peeping Toms “who watch History’s debauches through a hole in the wall” while not having to experience it themselves.

This willingness to stand by a brutal dictator—albeit passively—belies a deeper sickness on the contemporary left. Since the collapse of the Soviet Union, few on the left have had much real idea as to what a contemporary socialist economic program would—or should—look like in practice.

Although he is also critical of those on the right who he claims are glomming on to the current affairs in Venezuela in order to paint the modern Socialist movement as a failure.  It's definitely worth a read.



H/T: Bob from Brockley.

The Hypocrisy of Some Hijabis- Comedian Sadia Azmats

I have no issues with those who choose to dress modestly. To each his own, as they say.  And almost every religion has its conservative faction. What I do take issue with are those who use it as a political statement, those who force their women to dress conservatively, and those who might dress modestly but act in a contradictory fashion.

Take Sadia Azmats, a British Muslim stand-up comedian who wears a head covering, and then dresses like this.

The whole point of dressing "modestly in Islam, is not to call attention to oneself. Yet here Sadia is wearing skin-tight pants and red stiletto f-me shoes. Then again, she told Metro UK a few days ago:

It’s Ramadan, the month where Muslims not only fast our stomachs (during daylight hours) but when we Muslim women strive for modesty wherever it can be sought out.

The ‘modesty’ part is a bit of a problem for me. I’ve had sex during Ramadan (after Iftar, not during the fast which isn’t permitted) and it’s great.

Well it’s great all year round but there is a heightened sense of arousal given the increased awareness of primal urges through the hunger and thirst. If I had a choice, I’d give up a sandwich over semen.

But when I’m not observing fasting during the 30 days of Ramadan then society imposes upon me an almost involuntary fasting by holding me to a higher set of expectations than I do of myself.

Society expects me to be a ‘good girl’ and to lower my gaze around men. Muslim women are supposed to be bastions of culture, tradition, and responsibility, especially during Ramadan.

Muslim women like me – rounded, complicated, emotive and above all horny – aren’t even supposed to exist.

Say whaaat?  Premarital sex in Islam is haram (forbidden) and considered a sin. According to Al-Islam:

(A) Pre-Marital Sex
Pre-marital sex is absolutely forbidden in Islam, no matter whether it is with a girl-friend or a prostitute. Pre-marital sex is fornication (zina).

It also happens to be punishable according to Sharia law.

Allah says:

Do not go near adultery, surely it is an indecency, and an evil way [of fulfilling sexual urge]. (17:32)

Fornication and adultery have severely been condemned in the saying of the Prophet and the Imams. In Islam, pre-marital sex is considered an immoral act against the rights of Allah and one's own sexual organs.

Pre-marital sex is a sin punishable by the Islamic court. If an unmarried man and an unmarried woman are found guilty of fornication in an Islamic court, their punishment will be as the following:

The woman and the man who fornicate scourge each of them a hundred whips; and in the matter of God s religion, let no tenderness for them seize you if you believe in God and the Last Day; and let a party of the believers witness their punishment. (24:2)

If the unmarried man or woman commit fornication more than once, then they will be punished three times by hundred wipes, and if they are proven guilty for the fourth time, then they will be put to death.6 (As for adultery, its punishment is even more severe because married persons have no excuse, whatsoever, to commit adultery. The shari'ah says that married persons guilty of adultery should be stoned to death.)

Therefore, pre-marital sex is out of the question as a means of fulfilling the sexual urge.

So, on the one hand, Sadia is wearing a hijab to show her devotion to her Allah:

The hijab is worn by Muslim women as an act of obedience to God’s command in the Quran, where Allah (God) says:

وَقُل لِّلْمُؤْمِنَاتِ يَغْضُضْنَ مِنْ أَبْصَارِهِنَّ وَيَحْفَظْنَ فُرُوجَهُنَّ وَلَا يُبْدِينَ زِينَتَهُنَّ إِلَّا مَا ظَهَرَ مِنْهَا ۖ وَلْيَضْرِبْنَ بِخُمُرِهِنَّ عَلَىٰ جُيُوبِهِنَّ ۖ وَلَا يُبْدِينَ زِينَتَهُنَّ

“And tell the believing women to reduce [some] of their vision and guard their private parts and not expose their adornment except that which [necessarily] appears thereof and to wrap [a portion of] their headcovers over their chests and not expose their adornment….” (Quran 24:31)

And yet she's blatantly going against Islamic law by having pre-marital sex.

How's that for breathtaking hypocrisy.

I've written in the past about Muslim hijabi hypocrisy:  Bizarre hijabs worn by London women, and the Hypocrisy of Hijabi High-Fashion.  Yes, indeed, it exists.

Sadia wants to wear the hijab, I honestly don't care, but act accordingly.

Paul Harvey's 1965 Speech About The Dangers of Socialism- Video

Time to ratchet up the blogging considering the current state of affairs in our beloved land.  It's going to be an exceedingly long two years.

Since the Democratic Party is swinging way left, with many young socialists currently in Congress, and the daddy of them all Bernie Sanders ranking second in the polls for the 2020 Democratic presidential race, albeit way behind Biden, the following video seems very timely.

In 2017 Joe Marranca put together a short film titled "We Were Warned: Freedom to Chains" highlighting a speech the eloquent conservative radio host Paul Harvey gave back in 1965 warning the American people about the dangers of giving in to Socialist influences. What Harvey discusses well over 50 years ago is uncannily apropos. And scary.